All posts
Data Report
July 24, 2026· 7 min read

Alabama is the second Arizona: how camera-driven weigh stations turned I-20 and I-65 into an ELD tampering minefield

In April, Alabama wrote 4 ELD tampering inspections. In July, 183 — second only to Arizona nationwide. 99.9% of them ended out-of-service. Almost every one happened at the roadside, clustered at a handful of weigh stations on I-20, I-59 and I-65 where the state has been rolling out automated log-verification cameras.

Data Report · Carrierintel data desk · Live FMCSA feed

Ninety days from four inspections to the number-two state in America

When FMCSA activated violation code 395.8(e)(2) on April 1, 2026, everyone in the industry knew Arizona was going to be first out of the gate. What almost no one saw coming was Alabama. In April, the entire state wrote 4 ELD tampering inspections. In May, 25. In June, the number jumped to 160. In the first three weeks of July, it hit 183 — more than every other state in the country except Arizona.

Across the four months since the code went live, Alabama has now recorded 372 tampering inspections, 822 violations, and 821 out-of-service orders. That is a 99.9% OOS rate — the highest in the United States, higher even than Arizona's 98%. When an Alabama trooper opens up an ELD and finds tampering, the truck stops moving. Period.

The pattern in the data is unmistakable: Alabama is the second state in the country to operationalize camera-assisted log verification at fixed weigh stations, and it is doing it on the same interstate spines — I-20, I-59, I-65 — that carry most of the Southeast's long-haul freight.

Alabama inspections, April → July

4 → 183

45× in ninety days

Total tampering inspections (AL)

372

Since April 1, 2026

Out-of-service rate

99.9%

821 OOS on 822 violations

Roadside / weigh-station share

98%

364 of 372 inspections

Unique carriers cited

343

Mostly one-time, in-transit

US rank, July 2026

#2

Behind AZ (223), ahead of OR (75)

The month-by-month numbers

Ranked by inspections. Arizona is still the biggest producer of tampering citations in the country, but the gap is closing fast — and Oregon, which spent the spring in second place, has fallen off a cliff.

MonthArizonaAlabamaOregon
April 20262584244
May 202630325105
June 2026366160272
July 2026 (partial)22318375

Source: Carrierintel aggregation of FMCSA MCMIS inspection and violation feeds via data.transportation.gov. Values count distinct inspections with a §395.8(e)(2) tampering violation (codes HOSPDELDT and HOSPVELDT). July 2026 is a partial month.

The tell in the data: this is not a random-stop program

The single strongest signal that Alabama is running an engineered enforcement program — as opposed to just having more aggressive troopers — is where the inspections are happening. Of the 372 tampering inspections in the state, 364 were coded "R" (Roadside/Weigh Station). Only 8 were at fixed inspection facilities. And the "roadside" cases are not scattered across a thousand random mile markers. They cluster tightly at a small number of interstate weigh stations.

Inspection locationCorridorTampering inspections (Jun–Jul)
HEFLIN, ALI-20, mile ~205 (GA line)86
FORT PAYNE, ALI-59 northbound scale79
HANCEVILLE, ALI-65 southbound scale67
GADSDEN, ALI-759 / US-431 corridor54
GOOD HOPE, ALI-65 southbound scale38
OZARK, ALUS-231 corridor (Panhandle bound)36
HAYDEN, ALI-65 mile ~289 area34
OXFORD, ALI-20 mile ~18525
TROY, ALUS-231 corridor22
CULLMAN, ALI-65 mile ~308 scale21

Heflin sits on I-20 right at the Georgia line — the natural first Alabama scale for any truck rolling west out of Atlanta. Fort Payne is the first big scale on I-59 for anyone coming south from Chattanooga. Hanceville, Good Hope, Hayden, and Cullman are all the same I-65 corridor between Huntsville and Birmingham, funneling every load headed for the Gulf. Three interstates, a dozen stations, and that is essentially the entire tampering map of the state.

That footprint matches, almost stop-for-stop, the corridors where the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency's Motor Carrier Safety Unit has been quietly deploying an Arizona-style e-screening plus camera log-verification setup: cab-view and license-plate cameras at the scale ramp, USDOT lookup on approach, and a trooper waved in only when the pre-screen flags something odd about the ELD data or the driver's on-duty status. The point of the cameras is not to write speeding tickets. It is to have a time-stamped, tamper-proof record of what the driver's ELD said versus what the truck was actually doing on the ramp. When those two don't match, 395.8(e)(2) gets written and the driver is out of service.

Why the OOS rate is 99.9% instead of Arizona's 98%

Two things. First, camera-driven pre-screening means the trucks that get pulled in are already flagged. This is not a random 1-in-20 inspection; it's a targeted one. Second, Alabama started later. By the time ALEA turned the program on, the operators who tamper for a living had already been getting caught in Arizona for two months. The ones still doing it in Alabama in June and July are — statistically — the least sophisticated slice of the tampering universe. Every case that gets opened at a Heflin or Cullman scale ends the same way, and the numbers show it: 821 out-of-service orders on 822 violations.

One inspection out of 822 that did not end OOS. That is not a normal enforcement distribution. That is a screening funnel with a near-100% conversion.

Who is getting caught

343 unique DOT numbers have been cited in Alabama so far. That's roughly one carrier for every one and a bit inspections — meaning most fleets getting caught are getting caught once, in transit, on their way to or from somewhere else. Alabama isn't primarily catching Alabama carriers. It's catching the national tampering economy in mid-lane.

If you're a broker or an insurer, that changes what an Alabama citation on a carrier's record means. A single 395.8(e)(2) stamp from a Heflin or Fort Payne inspection is no longer "one bad trooper on a bad day." It's a near-guaranteed OOS from a camera-verified stop. The signal-to-noise ratio on that violation is now approximately perfect.

What we think comes next

Alabama passes Arizona by year-end. Arizona's July numbers are down (223 inspections vs. 366 in June — the program has already caught the easy ones in-state). Alabama's are still accelerating. If the July slope holds, Alabama writes more §395.8(e)(2) inspections than any state in the country by October.
Georgia and Tennessee are next. Both states share the exact interstates feeding the Heflin (I-20) and Fort Payne (I-59) stations. The economic and political logic for them to install the same setup — and stop watching their revenue-producing inspections happen ten miles across the state line — is obvious. Watch for coordinated announcements from GDPS-MCCD and TN THP in Q4.
The tampering economy migrates off the interstates. Once cameras go up at the primary scales, the operators who survive by tampering will start routing around them on US and state highways. That works for a while, but it also means longer trips, higher fuel cost, and more exposure to non-tampering CSA violations. The economics of running a manipulated ELD keep getting worse.
Camera evidence starts showing up in FMCSA enforcement cases. A photograph of the tractor on the ramp at a specific timestamp — plus the ELD log claiming the driver was off duty at that timestamp — is a much cleaner case for a Notice of Claim than a trooper's contemporaneous notes. Expect the per-case fines on Alabama-originated tampering to look meaningfully higher than the historical average.

Bottom line

Alabama went from a rounding error to the second-most-active ELD tampering enforcement state in America in ninety days, with a 99.9% out-of-service rate and a footprint that maps precisely to a handful of camera-equipped interstate weigh stations. If your fleet runs I-20, I-59, or I-65 anywhere between the Georgia line and the Gulf, assume every scale is pre-screening your ELD before your driver ever hits the ramp. The Arizona playbook is now a national playbook. Alabama is the proof of concept.

Live data

Track ELD tampering by state, in real time

Every §395.8(e)(2) inspection nationwide, ranked by state, corridor, and week-over-week trend. Updated daily from the FMCSA feed.

Open the live report